XFD647 C2 Maleimide *Same Structure to Alexa Fluor™ 647 C2 Maleimide*
Product key features
- Ex/Em: 650/671 nm
- Extinction coefficient: 270,000 cm-1M-1
- Reactive Group: Maleimide
- Versatile Conjugation: Efficiently labels thiol groups on proteins, antibodies, and oligonucleotides with stable thioether bonds
- Bright & Stable: Delivers intense fluorescence with resilience to photobleaching and pH variations from 4 to 10
- Hydrophilic: Minimizes aggregation, enhancing signal clarity for advanced imaging and live-cell studies
Product description
XFD647 is manufactured by AAT Bioquest, and it has the same chemical structure of Alexa Fluor® 647 (Alexa Fluor® is the trademark of ThermoFisher). It is a bright red-fluorescent dye optimal for use with the frequency-doubled He-Ne laser line. XFD647 dye is water soluble and pH-insensitive from pH 4 to pH 10. The maleimide of XFD647 is the most convenient thiol-reactive form for conjugating this dye to a protein or antibody.
Example protocol
PREPARATION OF STOCK SOLUTIONS
Unless otherwise noted, all unused stock solutions should be divided into single-use aliquots and stored at -20 °C after preparation. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Prepare a 10 mM XFD647 C5 maleimide stock solution by adding anhydrous DMSO to the vial of XFD647 C5 maleimide. Mix well by pipetting or vortexing.
Note: Before starting the conjugation process, prepare the dye stock solution (Solution B) and use it promptly. Prolonged storage of Solution B may reduce its activity. If necessary, Solution B can be stored in the freezer for up to 4 weeks, provided it is protected from light and moisture. Avoid freeze/thaw cycles.
Prepare a 1 mL protein labeling stock solution, by mixing 100 µL of a reaction buffer (e.g., 100 mM MES buffer with a pH ~6.0) with 900 µL of the target protein solution (e.g., an antibody or protein solution with a concentration >2 mg/mL if possible).
Note: The pH of the protein solution (Solution A) should be 6.5 ± 0.5.
Note: Impure antibodies or antibodies stabilized with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or other proteins will not be labeled well.
Note: The conjugation efficiency is significantly reduced if the protein concentration is less than 2 mg/mL. To achieve optimal labeling efficiency, it is recommended to maintain a final protein concentration within the range of 2-10 mg/mL.
If your protein does not contain a free cysteine, it must be treated with DTT or TCEP to generate a thiol group. DTT and TCEP are utilized to convert disulfide bonds into two free thiol groups. If using DTT, ensure to remove any free DTT via dialysis or gel filtration before conjugating a dye maleimide to your protein. Below is a sample protocol for generating a free thiol group:
To prepare a fresh solution of 1 M DTT, dissolve 15.4 mg of DTT in 100 µL of distilled water.
To prepare the IgG solution in 20 mM DTT, first, add 20 µL of DTT stock to each milliliter of the IgG solution while mixing gently. Then, allow the solution to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes without additional mixing. This resting period helps to minimize the reoxidation of cysteines to cystines.
Pass the reduced IgG through a filtration column that has been pre-equilibrated with "Exchange Buffer." Collect 0.25 mL fractions as they elute from the column.
Determine the protein concentrations and combine the fractions containing the highest amounts of IgG. This can be accomplished using either spectrophotometric or colorimetric methods.
Proceed with the conjugation immediately after this step (refer to the Sample Experiment Protocol for details).
Note: IgG solutions should be >4 mg/mL for the best results. The antibody should be concentrated if less than 2 mg/mL. Include an extra 10% for losses on the buffer exchange column.
Note: The reduction can be carried out in almost any buffers from pH 7-7.5, e.g., MES, phosphate, or TRIS buffers.
Note: Steps 3 and 4 can be replaced by dialysis.
SAMPLE EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL
This labeling protocol was designed for the conjugation of goat anti-mouse IgG with XFD647 C5 maleimide. You may need to further optimize the protocol for your specific proteins.
Note: Each protein requires a specific dye-to-protein ratio, which varies based on the properties of the dyes. Over-labeling a protein can negatively impact its binding affinity while using a low dye-to-protein ratio can result in reduced sensitivity.
Use a 10:1 molar ratio of Solution B (dye)/Solution A (protein) as the starting point. Add 5 µL of the dye stock solution (Solution B, assuming the dye stock solution is 10 mM) to the vial of the protein solution (95 µL of Solution A), and mix thoroughly by shaking. The protein solution has a concentration of ~0.05 mM assuming the protein concentration is 10 mg/mL and the molecular weight of the protein is ~200KD.
Note: We recommend using a 10:1 molar ratio of Solution B (dye) to Solution A (protein). If this ratio is not suitable, determine the optimal dye/protein ratio by testing 5:1, 15:1, and 20:1 ratios.
Continue to rotate or shake the reaction mixture at room temperature for 30-60 minutes.
The following protocol serves as an example for purifying dye-protein conjugates using a Sephadex G-25 column.
Follow the manufacturer's instructions to prepare the Sephadex G-25 Column.
Load the reaction mixture (from the "Run conjugation reaction" step) onto the top of the Sephadex G-25 column.
Add PBS (pH 7.2-7.4) as soon as the sample runs just below the top of the resin surface.
Add more PBS (pH 7.2-7.4) to the desired sample to complete the column purification. Then, combine the fractions that contain the desired dye-protein conjugate.
Note: For immediate use, dilute the dye-protein conjugate with staining buffer. If you need to use it multiple times, divide it into aliquots.
Note: For long-term storage, the dye-protein conjugate solution should be either concentrated or freeze-dried.
The Degree of Substitution (DOS) is a key factor in characterizing dye-labeled proteins. Proteins with a lower DOS generally have weaker fluorescence intensity, while those with a higher DOS may also have reduced fluorescence. For most antibodies, the optimal DOS is recommended to be between 2 and 10, depending on the properties of the dye and protein. For effective labeling, the DOS should be controlled to have 5-8 moles of XFD647 C5 maleimide per mole of antibody. The following steps outline how to determine the DOS of XFD647 C5 maleimide-labeled proteins.
To measure the absorption spectrum of a dye-protein conjugate, maintain the sample concentration between 1 and 10 µM. The exact concentration within this range will depend on the dye's extinction coefficient.
For most spectrophotometers, dilute the sample (from the column fractions) with de-ionized water until the OD values fall within the range of 0.1 to 0.9. The optimal absorbance for protein is at 280 nm, while for XFD647 C5 maleimide, it is at 650 nm. To ensure accurate readings, make sure the conjugate is free of any non-conjugated dye.
You can calculate DOS using our tool by following this link:
Calculators
Common stock solution preparation
0.1 mg | 0.5 mg | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 91.312 µL | 456.558 µL | 913.117 µL | 4.566 mL | 9.131 mL |
5 mM | 18.262 µL | 91.312 µL | 182.623 µL | 913.117 µL | 1.826 mL |
10 mM | 9.131 µL | 45.656 µL | 91.312 µL | 456.558 µL | 913.117 µL |
Molarity calculator
Mass (Calculate) | Molecular weight | Volume (Calculate) | Concentration (Calculate) | Moles | ||||
/ | = | x | = |
Spectrum
Product family
Name | Correction Factor (280 nm) |
AMCA C2 Maleimide | 0.153 |
EDANS C2 maleimide | 0.107 |
DABCYL C2 maleimide | 0.516 |
Citations
Authors: Patil, M. K., Kotresh, M. G., Inamdar, S. R.
Journal: Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc (2019): 142-152
Authors: Ostad, S. N., Babaei, S., Bayat, A. A., Mahmoudian, J.
Journal: Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother (2019): 25-29
Authors: Rai, S., Bhardwaj, U., Misra, A., Singh, S., Gupta, R.
Journal: Int J Lab Hematol (2018): e52-e54
Authors: Velazquez-Lopez, I., Leon-Cruz, E., Pardo, J. P., Sosa-Peinado, A., Gonzalez-Andrade, M.
Journal: Anal Biochem (2017): 13-22
Authors: Cui, J. J., Zhu, X. L., Ji, C. F., Jing, X. H., Bai, W. Z.
Journal: Zhen Ci Yan Jiu (2011): 262-7
References
Authors: Velazquez-Lopez, I.; Leon-Cruz, E.; Pardo, J. P.; Sosa-Peinado, A.; Gonzalez-Andrade, M.
Journal: Anal Biochem (2017): 13-22
Authors: Winne, J. M.; Irani, N. G.; Van den Begin, J.; Madder, A.
Journal: Methods Mol Biol (2017): 21-Sep
Authors: Maroteaux, M.; Liu, S. J.
Journal: eNeuro (2016)
Authors: Grate, J. W.; Mo, K. F.; Shin, Y.; Vasdekis, A.; Warner, M. G.; Kelly, R. T.; Orr, G.; Hu, D.; Dehoff, K. J.; Brockman, F. J.; Wilkins, M. J.
Journal: Bioconjug Chem (2015): 593-601
Authors: Fenton, K. E.; Martirosyan, N. L.; Abdelwahab, M. G.; Coons, S. W.; Preul, M. C.; Scheck, A. C.
Journal: Neurosurg Focus (2014): E12