ATTO 514 maleimide
Product key features
- Ex/Em: 510/531 nm
- Extinction coefficient: 115,000 cm-1M-1
- Reactive group: maleimide
- Versatile Conjugation: Efficient and stable labeling of thiol groups on proteins, antibodies, and oligonucleotide thiophosphates
- Superior Brightness & Stability: Provides robust quantum yield with high photostability and thermal stability
- Excellent Hydrophilicity: Prevents aggregation and enhances signal clarity for advanced imaging and live-cell applications
Product description
ATTO 514 is a rhodamine-based fluorescent labeling dye known for its favorable spectral qualities. With a high molar extinction coefficient, a fluorescence quantum yield of 0.85, high photo-stability, and excellent water solubility, it is an ideal choice for single-molecule detection, high-resolution microscopy (e.g., SIM and STED), flow cytometry, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). It exhibits its highest fluorescence efficiency when excited within the range of 510-535 nm, making it a perfect match for the 514 nm line of an argon-ion laser. ATTO 514 maleimide is used for labeling thiol-containing molecules, such as proteins, antibodies, ligands, and oligonucleotide thiophosphates.
Example protocol
PREPARATION OF STOCK SOLUTIONS
Unless otherwise noted, all unused stock solutions should be divided into single-use aliquots and stored at -20 °C after preparation. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Add anhydrous DMSO into the vial of ATTO 514 maleimide to make a 10 mM stock solution. Mix well by pipetting or vortex.
Note: Prepare the dye stock solution (Solution B) before starting the conjugation. Use promptly. Extended storage of the dye stock solution may reduce the dye activity. Solution B can be stored in the freezer for up to 4 weeks when kept from light and moisture. Avoid freeze-thaw cycles.
Mix 100 µL of a reaction buffer (e.g., 100 mM MES buffer with pH ~6.0) with 900 µL of the target protein solution (e.g. antibody, protein concentration >2 mg/mL if possible) to give 1 mL protein labeling stock solution.
Note: The pH of the protein solution (Solution A) should be 6.5 ± 0.5.
Note: Impure antibodies or antibodies stabilized with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or other proteins will not be labeled well.
Note: The conjugation efficiency is significantly reduced if the protein concentration is less than 2 mg/mL. For optimal labeling efficiency, the final protein concentration range of 2-10 mg/mL is recommended.
Optional: if your protein does not contain a free cysteine, you must treat your protein with DTT or TCEP to generate a thiol group. DTT or TCEP are used for converting a disulfide bond to two free thiol groups. If DTT is used you must remove free DTT by dialysis or gel filtration before conjugating a dye maleimide to your protein. Following is a sample protocol for generating a free thiol group:
- Prepare a fresh solution of 1 M DTT (15.4 mg/100 µL) in distilled water.
- Make IgG solution in 20 mM DTT: add 20 µL of DTT stock per ml of IgG solution while mixing. Let stand at room temp for 30 minutes without additional mixing (to minimize reoxidation of cysteines to cystines).
- Pass the reduced IgG over a filtration column pre-equilibrated with "Exchange Buffer". Collect 0.25 mL fractions off the column.
- Determine the protein concentrations and pool the fractions with the majority of the IgG. This can be done either spectrophotometrically or colorimetrically.
Carry out the conjugation as soon as possible after this step (see Sample Experiment Protocol).
Note: IgG solutions should be >4 mg/mL for the best results. The antibody should be concentrated if less than 2 mg/mL. Include an extra 10% for losses on the buffer exchange column.
Note: The reduction can be carried out in almost any buffers from pH 7-7.5, e.g., MES, phosphate, or TRIS buffers.
Note: Steps 3 and 4 can be replaced by dialysis.
SAMPLE EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL
This labeling protocol was developed for the conjugate of Goat anti-mouse IgG with ATTO 514 maleimide. You might need further optimization for your particular proteins.
Note: Each protein requires a distinct dye/protein ratio, which also depends on the properties of dyes. Over-labeling of a protein could detrimentally affect its binding affinity, while the protein conjugates of low dye/protein ratio give reduced sensitivity.
Use a 10:1 molar ratio of Solution B (dye)/Solution A (protein) as the starting point: Add 5 µL of the dye stock solution (Solution B, assuming the dye stock solution is 10 mM) into the vial of the protein solution (95 µL of Solution A) with effective shaking. The concentration of the protein is ~0.05 mM assuming the protein concentration is 10 mg/mL and the molecular weight of the protein is ~200KD.
Note: We recommend using a 10:1 molar ratio of Solution B (dye)/Solution A (protein). If it is too less or too high, determine the optimal dye/protein ratio at 5:1, 15:1, and 20:1, respectively.- Continue to rotate or shake the reaction mixture at room temperature for 30-60 minutes.
The following protocol is an example of dye-protein conjugate purification by using a Sephadex G-25 column.
- Prepare Sephadex G-25 column according to the manufacture instruction.
- Load the reaction mixture (From "Run conjugation reaction") to the top of the Sephadex G-25 column.
- Add PBS (pH 7.2-7.4) as soon as the sample runs just below the top resin surface.
Add more PBS (pH 7.2-7.4) to the desired sample to complete the column purification. Combine the fractions that contain the desired dye-protein conjugate.
Note: For immediate use, the dye-protein conjugate needs to be diluted with staining buffer, and aliquoted for multiple uses.
Note: For longer-term storage, the dye-protein conjugate solution needs to be concentrated or freeze-dried.
The Degree of Substitution (DOS) is the most important factor for characterizing dye-labeled protein. Proteins of lower DOS usually have weaker fluorescence intensity, but proteins of higher DOS tend to have reduced fluorescence too. The optimal DOS for most antibodies is recommended between 2 and 10, depending on the properties of dye and protein. For effective labeling, the degree of substitution should be controlled to have 5-8 moles of ATTO 514 maleimide to one mole of antibody. The following steps are used to determine the DOS of ATTO 514 maleimide labeled proteins.
To measure the absorption spectrum of a dye-protein conjugate, it is recommended to keep the sample concentration in the range of 1- 10 µM depending on the extinction coefficient of the dye.
For most spectrophotometers, the sample (from the column fractions) needs to be diluted with de-ionized water so that the OD values are in the range of 0.1 to 0.9. The O.D. (absorbance) at 280 nm is the maximum absorption of protein, while 531 nm is the maximum absorption of ATTO 514 maleimide. To obtain accurate DOS, make sure that the conjugate is free of the non-conjugated dye.
You can calculate DOS using our tool by following this link:
Spectrum
Product family
Name | Excitation (nm) | Emission (nm) | Extinction coefficient (cm -1 M -1) | Quantum yield | Correction Factor (260 nm) | Correction Factor (280 nm) |
iFluor® 514 maleimide | 511 | 527 | 750001 | 0.831 | 0.265 | 0.116 |
ATTO 488 maleimide | 499 | 520 | 90000 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.09 |
ATTO 532 maleimide | 531 | 552 | 115000 | 0.90 | 0.22 | 0.11 |
ATTO 647 maleimide | 646 | 666 | 120000 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
ATTO 647N maleimide | 645 | 663 | 150000 | 0.651 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
ATTO 594 maleimide | 602 | 621 | 120000 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.51 |
ATTO 565 maleimide | 562 | 589 | 120000 | 0.90 | 0.27 | 0.12 |
ATTO 390 maleimide | 390 | 475 | 24000 | .90 | 0.46 | 0.09 |
ATTO 425 maleimide | 438 | 484 | 45000 | 0.90 | 0.19 | 0.17 |
Show More (9) |
References
Authors: Sun, Zhiwei and Li, Juan and Tong, Yao and Zhao, Li and Zhou, Xiaoyu and Li, Hui and Wang, Chuanxin and Du, Lutao and Jiang, Yanyan
Journal: Biosensors (2022)
Authors: Chang, Young-Sheng and Chu, Li-Wei and Chen, Zan-Yu and Wu, Joh-Sin and Su, Wen-Chi and Yang, Chia-Jui and Ping, Yueh-Hsin and Lin, Cheng-Wen
Journal: Viruses (2022)
Authors: Yamamoto, Johtaro and Suzuki, Yoshio and Ogawa, Yoshikatsu and Kamata, Tomoyuki and Hashimoto, Hinako and Kunitake, Masashi and Kato, Dai
Journal: Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry (2022): 401-408
Authors: Heo, Wooseok and Hasegawa, Kazuto and Okamoto, Kenji and Sako, Yasushi and Ishii, Kunihiko and Tahara, Tahei
Journal: The journal of physical chemistry letters (2022): 1249-1257
Authors: Lu, Xuxing and Punj, Deep and Orrit, Michel
Journal: Nano letters (2022): 4215-4222