2D and 3D cell cultures are indispensable tools in areas of developmental biology, regenerative medicine, protein production, and clinical in vitro research studies. There are several key differences between the two.
| Basic of comparison | 2D Cell Culture | 3D Cell Culture |
| Definition | Is a culture environment in which cells are grown on flat dishes with coated surfaces to help them adhere and proliferate | Is a culture environment that allows cells to grow and interact with surrounding extracellular framework in three dimensions |
| Resemblance to environment in vivo | Not representative of real cell environments in vivo | More accurate representation of human tissue outside the body |
| Cell shape | Flat and stretched | Natural ellipsoid shape of cell is retained |
| Exposure of cell interface to medium | All cells are equally exposed to components of the medium | Cells are heterogeneously exposed to media components just as in physiological conditions, with the upper layer of the cell receiving higher exposure than the lower layer |
| Cell differentiation | Moderately to poorly differentiated | Well differentiated |
| Drug sensitivity | Cells are more sensitive and drugs show higher efficacy | Cells often show resistance and drugs show lower potency |
| Susceptibility to drug-induced apoptosis | Highly susceptible to drug-induced apoptotic stimuli | Enhanced resistance to drug-induced apoptotic stimuli |
| Advantages | Well established and fast; Inexpensive, easy and convenient to set up; Ealier cell observation and meaurement; Effective for primary assessment; Plenty of reference material available to compare results, high throughput capacity; easier environmental control, cell observation, measurement | More representative of real cell environmnet; Able to exhibit differentiated cellular function; Can better simulate microenvironment conditions in a living organism so cells and organs grow in a more realistic manner; Possible to co-culture 2 or more different cell types; Representation of barrier tissues is greatly enhanced; More realistic way to grow and treat tumor cells; Can better predict in vivo responses to drug treatments |
| Limitations | Not representative of real cell environment; Possible contamination of growth media by expansion of cells; In Vivo responses to drug treatment are not always predictable | expensive; Some types of measurements and microscopic analyses can be challenging because of the larger size of 3D cell cultures; Distributing oxygen and essential nutrients can be a challenge in larger cultures; Relatively lower throughput capacity |
Although establishing a 3D culture is more expensive and more laborious as compared to establishing a 2D culture, it is the preferred technique because it more closely represents human tissue outside the body.