logo
AAT Bioquest

BODIPY

BODIPY refers to a class of fluorophores known for their high fluorescence quantum yield and strong molar extinction coefficients, enhancing their stability during experiments (Zhang & Zhu, 2019). Notably, BODIPY dyes are less sensitive to light compared to other fluorescent dyes; the unsubstituted BODIPY dye has a fluorescence lifetime of 7.2 nanoseconds (Schmitt et al., 2008). Because of these properties, they have become a widely used method for visualizing and quantifying lipid content in biological samples (Courtis et al., 2014).

The use of BODIPY dyes extends beyond lipid visualization. They serve multiple roles in biological research, acting as metal ion probes with a strong affinity for alkali metal ions such as magnesium (Mg²⁺) and sodium (Na⁺). Additionally, BODIPY derivatives have been developed into molecular probes for detecting nitric oxide (NO), a crucial signaling molecule in many physiological processes (Zhang et al., 2013). One of the prominent features of BODIPY dyes is their selectivity for glutathione (GSH), making them valuable for assessing GSH levels in living cells. The modifiable structure of these dyes helps create derivatives such as BODIPY 488. Furthermore, BODIPY dyes can act as molecular switches; for example, phenyl selenium-substituted BODIPY fluorescent switches (BOD-phse) have been shown to effectively detect hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) in cellular environments. In addition to these uses, BODIPY can be utilized in conjunction with delivery systems, such as Lipofectamine, which is chemically known as 2,3-dioleoyloxy-N-[2(sperminecarboxamido)ethyl]-N,N-dimethyl-1-propanaminium trifluoroacetate (DOSPA).

When compared to other fluorescent dyes, BODIPY dyes offer several key advantages that make them highly effective as biological markers, including low photodegradation, charge neutrality, and minimal toxicity. Moreover, the hydrophobic characteristics of BODIPYs allow them to effectively penetrate cell membranes (Kand et al., 2020). However, despite these advantages, BODIPY dyes also have limitations. They exhibit high-energy absorption and emission, as well as relatively short Stokes shifts of approximately 5-15 nm. These characteristics can lead to light scattering, potentially resulting in a lower signal-to-noise ratio during imaging. (Yang et al., 2016)

In terms of biomolecule detection, BODIPY dyes excel at identifying a range of targets, including cholesterol, hydrogen nitroxide species (HNO), amyloid-β aggregates, and reactive nitrogen species (RNS; Nguyen et al., 2021). Various detection methods utilize fluorescent probes specific to HNO and RNS, along with assays like the BODIPY cholesterol assay (Bernecic et al., 2019). Their hydrophobic nature enables BODIPY dyes to bind effectively to different targets, including lipids and cellular membranes. Additionally, certain BODIPY conjugates can interact with drugs, proteins, and hormones, further enhancing their application uses.

BODIPY dyes, such as BODIPY FL and BODIPY 493/503, are common examples of BODIPY derivatives. BODIPY FL is characterized by its green fluorescence and excitation/emission maxima around 503/512 nm (Qin et al., 2004). It possesses a high extinction coefficient (EC > 80,000 cm⁻¹M⁻¹) and can achieve a quantum yield of 0.9 (Holicek, 2020). In contrast, BODIPY 493/503 serves as a tracer for neutral lipids, emitting a green fluorescence signal upon binding.   

If one chooses to carry out BODIPY staining, the first step in the procedure involves dissolving the dye in an organic solvent, such as DMSO, DMF, or methanol. For instance, to prepare a 2 μM BODIPY staining solution, a 5 mM stock solution can be created by dissolving 1.3 mg of BODIPY in 1 ml of DMSO, which is stable for storage at -20 °C (Qiu & Simon, 2016). Following preparation, cells should be washed with 3 ml of PBS to remove any media or serum. The BODIPY staining solution is then incubated with the cells for 15 to 30 minutes at room temperature, after which the cells are rinsed briefly with PBS to remove excess dye. Finally, the samples are mounted on a microscope coverslip for visualization using a fluorescence microscope.

Further Reading

  1. Bernecic, N C, et al. “BODIPY-Cholesterol Can Be Reliably Used to Monitor Cholesterol Efflux from Capacitating Mammalian Spermatozoa.” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, 8 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45831-7.

  2. Courtis, Alexandra M, et al. Monoalkoxy BODIPYs—a Fluorophore Class for Bioimaging. Vol. 25, no. 6, 14 May 2014, pp. 1043–1051, https://doi.org/10.1021/bc400575w.

  3. Holicek, Viktor. “Developing Tools to Study Carbohydrate Processing Enzymes in AmpC β-Lactamase Antibiotic Resistance and OGA-Based Neurodegenerative Research.” Summit.sfu.ca, 18 Dec. 2020, summit.sfu.ca/item/34461.

  4. Kand, Dnyaneshwar, et al. “Water-Soluble BODIPY Photocages with Tunable Cellular Localization.” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 142, no. 11, 29 Feb. 2020, pp. 4970–4974, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13219.

  5. Nguyen, Van-Nghia, et al. “Recent Developments of BODIPY-Based Colorimetric and Fluorescent Probes for the Detection of Reactive Oxygen/Nitrogen Species and Cancer Diagnosis.” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 439, July 2021, p. 213936, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213936.

  6. Qin, Zheng‐Hong, et al. “Huntingtin Bodies Sequester Vesicle-Associated Proteins by a Polyproline-Dependent Interaction.” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 1, 7 Jan. 2004, pp. 269–281, https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1409-03.2004.

  7. Qiu, Bo, and M. Simon. “BODIPY 493/503 Staining of Neutral Lipid Droplets for Microscopy and Quantification by Flow Cytometry.” BIO-PROTOCOL, vol. 6, no. 17, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21769/bioprotoc.1912.

  8. Schmitt, Alexander, et al. “Synthesis of the Core Compound of the BODIPY Dye Class: 4,4′-Difluoro-4-Bora-(3a,4a)-Diaza-s-Indacene.” Journal of Fluorescence, vol. 19, no. 4, 7 Dec. 2008, pp. 755–758, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-008-0446-7.

  9. Yang, Liutao, et al. “Asymmetric Anthracene-Fused BODIPY Dye with Large Stokes Shift: Synthesis, Photophysical Properties and Bioimaging.” Dyes and Pigments, vol. 126, 1 Mar. 2016, pp. 232–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.11.028.

  10. Zhang, Xian-Fu, and Jiale Zhu. “BODIPY Parent Compound: Fluorescence, Singlet Oxygen Formation and Properties Revealed by DFT Calculations.” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 205, 1 Jan. 2019, pp. 148–157, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022231318307440?via%3Dihub, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.09.017.

  11. Zhang, Hui-Xian, et al. “Highly Sensitive Determination of Nitric Oxide in Biologic Samples by a Near-Infrared BODIPY-Based Fluorescent Probe Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.” Talanta, vol. 116, 24 May 2013, pp. 335–342, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039914013004669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.05.043.



Original created on October 31, 2024, last updated on October 31, 2024
Tagged under: